Table of Contents

Facilitation

The art of healthy group conversations.

Better Practices

This is a list of practices I believe contribute to healthy and effective meetings. I don't do all of these consistently yet, and taken together they can sound rigid, even grognardy. But my best meeting experiences involved many of these at once and I find the structure frees us all up for collective thought. Note, these are focused on small meetings (up to 12 people) and are not necessarily appropriate for meetings with an “audience.”

Everyone knows the purpose of the meeting.

Why: The time of our employees is our most valuable resource. A meeting with no purpose is a waste of time for everyone. A meeting with an unclear purpose also wastes time, because attendees may steer the meeting in unproductive directions, or stay when they are not needed. Also forces organizers to ask, “should this be a memo instead?”

How:

The meeting follows an agenda.

Why: If a purpose is “what” the meeting will accomplish, the agenda is “how” the meeting will accomplish it. A good agenda empowers attendees to prepare, directs the focus of the group to improve listening, and protects the meeting's goal from unforeseen tangents and arguments.

How:

The meeting generates artifacts.

Why: Concretizing meeting outcomes with writings, drawings or other artifacts creates clarity, even if you never fully read through your archive of notes. It converges attendees' different recollections and interpretations. It encourages transparency to those who could not attend or were not invited. It promotes accountability.

How:

Everyone knows the norms.

Why: We think as a group through wide participation and productive disagreement; to do this kindly, safely and effectively, we adopt practices that encourage participation and minimize unproductive disagreement.

How: Agree on norms up front that establish accepted conduct in the meeting. In some meetings the group can borrow from company or team norms for this. In other meetings it is helpful to establish norms for the conversation at hand.

I want to give special attention to encouraging participation. I've heard many leaders use the mantra “Silence is agreement” and while I understand the spirit of putting responsibility on participants to speak up, in my experience this approach is not sensitive to the preferences and power dynamics in the room. A quick improvement on typical meeting participation is giving folks many different ways to participate:

A skilled facilitator has a lot of power to encourage participation. From the old HBR article, “draw out the silent… protect the weak… come to the most senior people last.”

All necessary roles are filled.

Clear roles also help keep things moving and minimize unproductive conflict

Other sources on meeting practices

Antony Jay, HBR / How To Run a Meeting (1976)

Matt Green, Skillcast / 12 Best Practices for Productive Meetings (2022)

Safety

Liz Keogh / How to run Safety Checks

Types of meetings

(TODO) team meetings, workstream meetings, project meetings, issue meetings, leadership meetings, planning meetings, retrospectives…